USPTO serial 77314519
ORGANIC SUNSHINE BURGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ORGANIC SUNSHINE BURGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ellenville, NY
Ellenville, NY
Ellenville, NY
SUNSHINE BURGER & SPECIALTY FOOD COMPANY, LLC
FORT ATKINSON, WI
Other trademarks owned by SUNSHINE BURGER & SPECIALTY FOOD COMPANY, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
Richard J. McKenna Foley & Lardner LLP777 E. Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen organic vegetarian burgers, made of organic ground raw sunflower seeds, organic brown rice, organic carrots, organic herbs and sea-salt, pre-baked and browned | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine Burger Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine Burger Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Sunshine Burger Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNSHINE BURGER & SPECIALTY FOOD COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ORGANIC SUNSHINE BURGERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |