Drawing for FLORIDA REVIEW

USPTO serial 77314606

FLORIDA REVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLORIDA REVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Genilde GUERRA

GENILDE GUERRA KRAVITZ & GUERRA P.A.800 BRICKELL AVE STE 701MIAMI, FL 33131-2967UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services; Direction of making radio or television programs; Entertainment in the nature of television news shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment services, namely, planning and conducting a series of film festivals; Entertainment, namely, television news shows; Film distribution; Film editing; Film mastering services; Motion picture film production; Motion picture song production; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video,and films; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; News analysis and features distribution; News reporting services; Newspaper publication; Newspaper publishing; On-line library services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature newspapers, magazines, photographs and pictures via an on-line computer network; Online electronic publishing of books and periodicals; Presentation of live show performances; Production and distribution of independent motion pictures; Production and distribution of motion pictures; Production and distribution of radio programs; Production and distribution of television shows and movies; Production of cable television programs; Production of radio and television programs; Production of radio or television programs; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of entertainment; Publication and editing of printed matter; Publication of books; Publication of books, magazines, almanacs and journals; Publication of books, of magazines, of journals, of newspapers, of periodicals, of catalogs, of brochures; Publication of books, reviews; Publication of brochures; Publication of electronic magazines; Publication of electronic newspapers accessible via a global computer network; Publication of journals; Publication of magazines; Publication of periodicals; Publication of printed matter; Publication of text books; Publication of texts, books, journals; Publication of texts, books, magazines and other printed matter; Publication of the editorial content of sites accessible via a global computer network; Publishing of books and reviews; Publishing of books, magazines; Publishing of electronic publications; Publishing of reviews; Publishing of web magazines; Television production; Television show production; Video editing; Video mastering services; Video tape editing; Video tape recording for others; Videotape production; VideotapingACTIVEJan 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance