USPTO serial 77314761
EARLY START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARLY START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris E. Cohen
Morris E. Cohen Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, LLP1500 Broadway, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Three dimensional models for educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Baby multiple activity toys; Bath toys; Bathtub toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels; Children's multiple activity toys; Children's multiple activity toys sold as a unit with printed books; Children's wire construction and art activity toys; Clockwork toys; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Crib toys; Drawing toys; Electric action toys; Electronic action toys; Electronic toy vehicles; Infant action crib toys; Infant development toys; Infant toys; Inflatable bath toys; Inflatable thin rubber toys; Inflatable toys; Inflatable toys showing decorative pictures; Lever action toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Musical toys; Plastic character toys; Play mats containing infant toys; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positionable printed toy figures for use in games; Positionable printed toy figures for use in puzzles; Positionable three dimensional toys for use in games; Positionable toy figures; Positionable two dimensional toys for use in games; Printed positionable toys for use in children's board games; Printing toys; Rubber character toys; Sand toys; Sandbox toys; Sketching toys; Soft sculpture plush toys; Soft sculpture toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toy bears; Stuffed toys; Talking electronic press-down toy; Toy animals and accessories therefor; Toy bakeware and cookware; Toy banks; Talking toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy airplanes; Toy clocks and watches; Toy houses; Toy construction blocks; Toy construction sets; Toy figures; Toy mail boxes; Toy mobiles; Toy model hobbycraft kits; Toy modeling dough; Toy pianos, sold as a unit with printed books in the field of music education; Toy prism glasses; Toy rockets; Toy sets of carpenters' tools; Toy watches; Toy xylophones; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Toys designed to be attached to car seats, strollers, cribs, and high chairs; Two and three dimensional positionable figures sold as an integral component of toys; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with educational books; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with memory training equipment.; Two and three dimensional positionable toy figures sold as a unit with other toys; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys; Toy harmonicas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Educational Publishing, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Educational Publishing, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named EARLY START
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |