USPTO serial 77314817
PACKARD BELL - AMERICA GREW UP LISTENING TO US . . . IT STILL DOES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACKARD BELL - AMERICA GREW UP LISTENING TO US . . . IT STILL DOES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
Robert W. Sacoff Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geralds311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 5000Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONSUMER ELECTRONIC, STEREOPHONIC AND HIGH FIDELITY GOODS, NAMELY, RADIOS, TELEVISION SETS AND TELEVISION SCREENS, AUDIO SPEAKERS, AMPLIFIERS, STEREO TUNERS, CD PLAYERS AND CD RECORDERS, DVD PLAYERS AND DVD RECORDERS, MP3 PLAYERS, VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYERS AND RECORDERS, CAMERAS AND DIGITAL CAMERAS, DIGITAL CAMCORDERS, PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDERS, MOBILE VIDEO NAVIGATION SYSTEMS IN THE NATURE OF ON BOARD COMPUTERS FOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Packard Bell B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Packard Bell B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by ACER INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PACKARD BELL - AMERICA GREW UP LISTENING TO US . . . IT STILL DOES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |