USPTO serial 77315079
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Plumley
DAVID A. PLUMLEY CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP.O. BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Compilation and systemization of information and data into computer databases, namely, compilation and systemization of consumer comments, recommendations, blogs, ratings, comparisons and other feedback regarding their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals; compilation and provision of online directories, namely, directories of products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals based on consumer comments, recommendations, blogs, ratings, comparisons and other feedback; database management services; rental of advertising space and provision of advertising space on the internet, on webpages, in electronic newsletters and electronic magazines and in printed newsletters and printed magazines, all featuring consumer comments, recommendations, blogs, ratings, comparisons and/or other feedback regarding their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals; preparing, creating and placing advertisements on webpages and in electronic newsletters and electronic magazines and in printed newsletters and printed magazines, all featuring consumer comments, recommendations, blogs, ratings, comparisons and/or other feedback regarding their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals, and updating such advertising material; providing business information based on consumer comments, recommendations, blogs, ratings, comparisons and other feedback regarding their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals, on webpages featuring blogs, discussions and/or other input from consumers, in electronic newsletters and electronic magazines and in printed newsletters and printed magazines; online compiling, reporting, analyzing and researching business, consumer, market and statistical information and data in relation to products and services, namely, information of a qualitative, quantitative and comparative nature supplied by, or based on information supplied by, consumers in relation to the quality, price, value, speed of delivery and level of consumer satisfaction with particular products, services, brands, businesses and service providers across different categories of trade, business and professions; online compiling, reporting, analyzing and researching business, consumer, market and statistical information and data in relation to products and services, namely, providing access to a website or database enabling consumers to leave comments, blogs, make ratings, make comparisons and make other inputs regarding their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals, and organizing, publishing and disseminating such information; consumer advocacy services, namely, raising awareness about the quality, price, value, speed of delivery and level of consumer satisfaction with particular products, services, brands, businesses and service providers across different categories of trade, business and professions on behalf of consumers for the improvement of quality, price, value, speed of delivery and level of consumer satisfaction with particular products, services, brands, businesses and service providers across different categories of trade, business and professions, seeking improvements across these areas on behalf of consumers and making complaints on behalf of dissatisfied consumers; consumer advocacy services, namely, collecting and sharing information from a diversity of consumers about their experience and level of satisfaction with different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals; consumer market information services, namely, providing consumers with information about different products, services, brands, businesses, service providers and professionals, helping consumers to make more informed decisions about same; business inquiries, investigation, evaluation services, business examination and monitoring services, namely, examining, monitoring and tracking the price and quality of goods and services provided by others, based on purchases of such goods and services, and consideration of consumer feedback; none of the aforementioned services comprising product marketing services, conducted on behalf of other businesses, by means of group discussions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |