Drawing for TOP GRADE MATERIALS

USPTO serial 77315118

TOP GRADE MATERIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP GRADE MATERIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H. JAFFER

DAVID H. JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPMCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Aggregate rock composed of crushed stone and alluvium sand and gravelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 16, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 16, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 1, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 23, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 5, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 20, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 20, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 20, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance