Drawing for CASA COR INTERIOR DESIGN EXHIBITION

USPTO serial 77315230

CASA COR INTERIOR DESIGN EXHIBITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASA COR INTERIOR DESIGN EXHIBITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Catalogues in the field of decor; bookbindingsACTIVE—
035Arranging and conducting trade show exhibitions in the field of decorACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, conducting decor fairs; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops in the field of decor; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of decor fairs; providing facilities for recreation activities; museums; entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of decor designs; organizing exhibitions for educational purposes in the field of decor; party planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 1, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance