USPTO serial 77316008
HELPING OTHERS NEVER GOES OUT OF STYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELPING OTHERS NEVER GOES OUT OF STYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Laurent, CA
ST-LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LL60 STATE ST STE 25BOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, deodorants, hair care preparations, makeup, nail polish, perfumery, non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams and lotions, skin soaps for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, namely, bracelets, brooches, earrings, necklaces, rings, watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | briefcases, business card cases, leather bags, handbags, wallets, purses, all purpose carry and travel bags, namely, luggage, luggage tags, athletic bags, backpacks, canvas bags, carry-all bags, daypacks, duffel bags, fanny packs, mesh shopping bags, nylon shopping bags, rucksacks, schoolbags, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and accessories, namely, jeans, shorts, skirts, dresses, Bermuda pants, sweatpants, overalls, jumpers, pants, slacks, trousers, shirts, blouses, pullovers, t-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, polo shirts, sweaters, suits, blazers, cardigans, jerseys, socks, underwear, boxer shorts, slips, briefs, panties, teddies, bras, nighties, undershirts, nightgowns, pajamas, dressing gowns, tights, camisoles, gauchos, leggings, bathing suits and swimwear, bikinis, jogging suits, track pants, vests, jackets, coats, anoraks, parkas, ponchos, raincoats, shells, headwear, namely, hats, caps, earbands, toques, visors, clothing accessories, namely, ascots, ties, belts, mittens, gloves, shawls, scarves, neck warmers, waistbands, sarongs, footwear, namely, boots, sandals, shoes, slippers, flip-flops | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring sale of clothing, bags, personal care products, jewelry and fashion accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 9101-2096 Quebec Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BASCO IP L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HELPING OTHERS NEVER GOES OUT OF STYLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |