USPTO serial 77316310
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Crittenden
John W. Crittenden Cooley Godward Kronish LLP101 California Street5th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-5800Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, aprons, baby bottoms, baby tops, bathrobes, beanies, boxer shorts, children's and infants' cloth bibs, cloth diapers, dress shirts, fleece pullovers, fleece vests, flip flops, gloves, gym shorts, hooded pullovers and sweatshirts, infant and toddler one piece clothing, infant sleepers, jackets, jogging suits, knit shirts, knitted caps, loungewear, nightwear, pajamas, pants, plastic baby bibs, polo shirts, pullovers, rainproof jackets, scarves, shirts, shorts, short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts, shower caps, skirts and dresses, sleep masks, sleepwear, socks, sweat pants, sweat jackets, sweat shirts, sweatbands, sweaters, swimwear, tank tops, thermal underwear, vests, visors, wind resistant jackets, wristbands | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |