Drawing for MAESTRO

USPTO serial 77316751

MAESTRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAESTRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Leonardo

MARK S. LEONARDO BROWN RUDNICK1 FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111-2621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in case management in the field of financial recovery, namely, software that allows users to create documents, namely, demand letters, process collection claims and track recoupment paymentsABANDONED—
035Providing services for healthcare providers as business solutions, namely, program analysis, namely, providing an on-line computer database in the field of pricing insurance services and comparing prices of insurance services; business consulting services in the field of training; and audits and investigations, namely, account auditing focusing on coding review, compliance audits, medical review, cost analysis and drug rebatesABANDONED—
036Financial recovery, namely, debt recovery and collection agencies featuring collections, recoupment and demand letters; providing information and online computer databases for the purposes of review and verification of insurance eligibility; rate setting, namely, insurance premium rate computingABANDONED—
041Training services in the field of insurance claims processing, advertising and communication technologiesABANDONED—
042Data analytics, namely, data mining for overpayment, error and waste analysis, fraud and abuse detection and codingABANDONED—
045Case management services, namely, the coordination of medical services for consumersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 10, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 10, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 10, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance