USPTO serial 77317040
DIGITAL BODY LANGUAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL BODY LANGUAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B Goldsmith
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVEFL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE MANAGEMENT, OPTIMIZATION, MEASUREMENT AND AUTOMATION OF MARKETING PROCESSES OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE FACILITATION OF THE SEGMENTATION AND TARGETING OF LEADS AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS FOR MARKETING PURPOSES; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE MANAGEMENT AND MEASUREMENT OF THE MARKETING AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO INCREASING EFFICIENCY AND PROFESSIONALISM OF THE MARKETING PROCESS AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO DEMONSTRATING VALUE AND ACCOUNTABILITY WITHIN THE MARKETING AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO THE ALIGNMENT OF THE MARKETING AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2008 |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED TO MANAGE, MEASURE AND OPTIMIZE THE MARKETING PROCESSES AND SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; CONSULTING SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED TO FACILITATE THE SEGMENTATION AND TARGETING OF CURRENT AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS FOR MARKETING AND SALE PURPOSES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF LEAD GENERATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INCREASING REVENUE OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |