USPTO serial 77317185
CAÉSAR PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAÉSAR PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark G. Kachigian
MARK G. KACHIGIAN HEAD, JOHNSON & KACHIGIAN228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119-4608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, pads for application to the human body which provide a cooling or warming effect | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |