USPTO serial 77317266
ALEXA RODULFO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALEXA RODULFO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations, cosmetic kits comprised of lipsticks and mascara, adhesive false eyelashes, coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes, perfumes and toilet water, nail polishes, deodorant for personal use, pre-moistened makeup removal wipes, rice powder for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic preparations for eye lashes, cosmetic pencils, all kinds of makeup remover, oil based cosmetics, cotton for cosmetic use, bath salts for cosmetic use, nail polish remover, beauty mask, lipsticks, sachets, cosmetics for eyebrow, lipgloss, lotions for cosmetic use, preparations for tanning and self tanning, all types of hair products for cosmetic purposes, namely, hairsprays, shampoo, hair conditioner, gel mousse, creams for cosmetic purposes, rice paper tissue for cosmetic purposes and cosmetic preparations for skin care | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | All type of brushes for cosmetic use; combs; combs for eyebrows | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty salon, day spa services, namely, nail care, manicure, pedicure and nail enhancements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodulfo, Rocio Alejandra
- Other trademarks owned by Rodulfo, Rocio Alejandra
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ALEXA RODULFO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2009 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |