USPTO serial 77317580
THEJEWELERSCOLLECTION, BY TCMPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEJEWELERSCOLLECTION, BY TCMPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lalitha Rao
Lalitha Rao PARTRIDGE SNOW & HAHN LLP180 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online ordering featuring jewelry, precious metal money clips, watches, pens and ceramic figurines; Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of jewelry, precious metal money clips, watches, pens and ceramic figurines; On-line retail store services featuring jewelry, precious metal money clips, watches, pens and ceramic figurines; Retail store services featuring jewelry, precious metal money clips, watches, pens and ceramic figurines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |