USPTO serial 77317695
CBC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Petersen
SCOTT W. PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP131 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET30TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60603-5517Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transfer of data via computer terminals; providing access to on-line directories, indices and searchable databases relating to a variety of information and data available on a global computer network; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users, concerning topics on entertainment; providing communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; providing access to Internet protocol television (IPTV); digital broadcasting of radio, television programs and movies via a global computer network; interactive television broadcasting services; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning entertainment, movies and television programs; Internet service provider | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |