USPTO serial 77318020
BP BEAUTIFULLY PURE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BP BEAUTIFULLY PURE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leesburg, VA
Palisades Park, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Adhesives for cosmetic use; After-sun gels; After-sun milks; After-sun oils; Almond soaps; Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Antibacterial skin soaps; Aromatherapy body care products, namely, body lotion, shower gel, cuticle cream, shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated lip balm, soap, body polish, body and foot scrub and non-medicated foot cream; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bar soap; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body cream soap; Cleaner for cosmetic brushes; Cleansing creams; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Concealers; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Cosmetics for animals; Cosmetics, namely lip primer; Cosmetics, namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Cream soaps; Deodorant soap; Disinfectant soaps; Disinfecting perfumed soaps; Greases for cosmetic purposes; Hand soaps; Henna for cosmetic purposes; Liquid bath soaps; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Liquid soaps; Liquid soaps for hands and face; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Medicated soaps; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Perfumed soaps; Retinol cream for cosmetic purposes; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Shaving soap; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; Tanning gels; Tanning milks; Tanning oils; Toners; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Waterless soap | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |