USPTO serial 77318270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Covington, LA
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Covington, LA
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Dallas, TX
SMOOTHIE KING FRANCHISES, INC.
DALLAS, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S. ROTH
GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 4, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 21, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |