USPTO serial 77318974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne S. Mason
Anne S. Mason Mason Law4592 Ulmerton Road, Suite 101Clearwater, FL 33762UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet water, cosmetic preparations for bath, lipsticks, body creams, exfoliating body creams, beauty masks, deodorants for personal use, lotions for cosmetic use, make-up for the face, oils for cosmetic use; cosmetic products for skin care, namely, creams for hands, creams for feet creams for face; perfumery products, namely, perfumes and deodorants; perfumes, pomades for cosmetic use, toilet soaps, liquid toilet soaps, bath salts; toilet products, namely, hair creams,and shampoos | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |