USPTO serial 77319328
PIRANHA BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIRANHA BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph DiRienzo
JOSEPH DIRIENZO DIRIENZO & DIRIENZO, P.A.116 SAINT PAUL STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-2145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) All purpose cleaning preparations; Floor stripping/cleaning preparation; General purpose cleaning, polishing, and abrasive liquids and powders(Based on Intent to Use) Cleaning preparations for household purposes;Floor buffing compound; Floor polish; Floor polishes; Floor wax; Floor wax remover | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
| 007 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Pads for floor polishing machines(Based on Intent to Use) Carpet cleaning machines;Automatic floor scrubbers; Floor buffers; Floor edgers; Floor polishing machines; Floor sanders; Floor scrubbing machines; Floor washing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Mops(Based on Intent to Use) Cleaning cloths; Cleaning combs; Cleaning cotton; Cleaning mitts of fabric; Cleaning pads; Cleaning rags; Cleaning sponges; Cleaning swabs for commercial uses; Dusting or cleaning cloths; Metal wool for cleaning; Mitts of fabric for cleaning; Pads of metal for cleaning | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2001 |
| 040 | Honing of concrete floors; Honing of floors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bio-Shine, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PIRANHA BRAND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |