Drawing for Serial No. 77319422

USPTO serial 77319422

Serial No. 77319422

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77319422?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Peter Harvey

D. PETER HARVEY HARVEY SISKIND LLP39TH FLOOR4 EMBARCADERO CENTERSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consumer lending, payment and credit practices research, evaluation, standards setting, and information dissemination, namely, compiling, reviewing, analyzing and assessing data regarding and establishing standards in the fields of consumer lending, payment and credit practices, and evaluating and monitoring participating lenders' and card issuers' compliance therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 28, 2008PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 27, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 14, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 14, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance