USPTO serial 77319772
HAYDRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAYDRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Starshak
Kathryn Starshak K&L Gates LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Bale soakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |