USPTO serial 77319928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Francis
MATTHEW FRANCIS WATSON ROUNDS5371 KIETZKE LNRENO, NV 89511-2083UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Beverage glassware, plates, coffee mugs, tumblers, water glasses, and Stemware; Crystal, namely, crystal beverage ware and crystal stemware; China, namely, china dishes, china bowls, china plates, and stainless steel kitchen utensils, namely, cooking spoons forks and spatulas, Dinnerware composed of stoneware, porcelain and bone china; Cooking utensils, namely, pots, pans, non-electric skillets, casseroles and kettles, thermal beverage containers, carafes and servers in the nature of cake servers and coffee servers, and giftware made of ceramic material, glass or wood, namely, vases, bowls, decanters, pitchers, and candlesticks | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Sauces and marinades; salad dressings; Spices; Vinegar; Condiments in the nature of ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise, relish, salsa; Candy; Prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Flavorings for butter | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Restaurant and bar franchising | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |