Drawing for SABOR! LOS ARCOS RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 77320242

SABOR! LOS ARCOS RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SABOR! LOS ARCOS RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Pasulka

KATHLEEN A. PASULKA PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4496UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 15, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 7, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 7, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 13, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 29, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 29, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 27, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 27, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance