USPTO serial 77320277
THE RETAIL EQUATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with THE RETAIL EQUATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
IRVINE, CA
Irvine, CA
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Nagle, Jr.
David W. Nagle, Jr. Stites & Harbison, PLLC400 West Market St.Suite 1800Louisville, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING RETURN AUTHORIZATION INFORMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING RECEIPT RECONCILIATION INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF RETURN AUTHORIZATION, COUPONS, FRAUD AND ABUSE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ALLOWING RETAILERS TO DETECT AND STOP FRAUDULENT AND ABUSIVE RETURN BEHAVIOR AS WELL AS INCREASE SALES AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY; FRAUD DETECTION SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TRACKING OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND DETECTING FRAUDULENT OR ABUSIVE RETURNS OR EXCHANGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING RETURN INFORMATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DETECTING AND TRACKING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND IMPROPER RETURNS USED BY RETAILERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR STORING INFORMATION ABOUT CUSTOMERS' HISTORY OF RETURNS TO DETERMINE WHETHER RETURNS SHOULD BE ALLOWED; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING RETURNS; COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMERS' AND RECIPIENTS' PRODUCT RETURNS DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY RETAILERS WHICH PROCESSES RETURNS THROUGH REAL-TIME RETURN AUTHORIZATIONS THAT SCREEN FOR RETURNS FRAUD BY ANALYZING RETURN BEHAVIOR AND IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC RETURN PATTERNS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENCOURAGING CUSTOMERS TO MAKE ADDITIONAL PURCHASES AT THE POINT OF TRANSACTION; ELECTRONIC DATABASE FOR USE BY RETAIL STORE OPERATORS TO EVALUATE AND TRACK FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, CUSTOMER SERVICES PERFORMANCE, CUSTOMER AND CONSUMER INFORMATION, COUPON ACTIVITY, INVENTORY, PURCHASE HISTORY, RETURN HISTORY, AND AVAILABLE REWARDS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RETURN AUTHORIZATION SERVICES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RETURN MANAGEMENT SERVICES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RECEIPT RECONCILIATION SERVICES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE WITH CONSUMER INFORMATION RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR ALLOWING RETAILERS TO DETECT AND STOP FRAUDULENT AND ABUSIVE RETURN BEHAVIOR AS WELL AS INCREASE SALES AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR TRACKING OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND DETECTING FRAUDULENT OR ABUSIVE RETURNS OR EXCHANGES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING RETURN INFORMATION RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR DETECTING AND TRACKING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND IMPROPER RETURNS USED BY RETAILERS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR STORING INFORMATION ABOUT CUSTOMERS' HISTORY OF RETURNS TO DETERMINE WHETHER RETURNS SHOULD BE ALLOWED RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROCESSING RETURNS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMERS' AND RECIPIENTS' PRODUCT RETURNS DATA RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR RETAILERS TO PROCESS RETURNS EASILY AND ACCURATELY ACROSS ALL STORES AND CHANNELS THROUGH REAL-TIME RETURN AUTHORIZATIONS THAT SCREEN FOR RETURNS FRAUD BY ANALYZING RETURN BEHAVIOR AND IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC RETURN PATTERNS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE SYSTEM TO ENCOURAGE CUSTOMERS TO MAKE ADDITIONAL PURCHASES AT THE POINT OF TRANSACTION RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC DATABASE RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA FOR PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPONS AND INCENTIVES BASED ON CONSUMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOR; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC DATABASE FOR PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPONS AND INCENTIVES BASED ON CONSUMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOR; MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT WITH ALL OF THE FOREGOING GOODS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED REPORTS AND MANUALS IN FIELDS OF RETURN AUTHORIZATION, RECEIPT RECONCILIATION, FRAUD DETECTION, RETURN ABUSE, CUSTOMER LOYALTY, AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION RELATING TO SHOPPING, RETURNS AND PURCHASE HISTORIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETURN MANAGEMENT, namely, MANAGEMENT OF RETURNED MERCHANDISE; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, namely, TRACKING OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND DETECTING FRAUDULENT OR ABUSIVE RETURNS OR EXCHANGES; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION, namely, PROVIDING CUSTOMERS' AND RECIPIENTS' PRODUCT RETURNS DATA; [ PROVIDING RETURN AUTHORIZATION SERVICES TO RETAILERS THROUGH A COMPUTER DATABASE TO AUTHORIZE MERCHANDISE RETURN BY CONSUMERS BY INFORMING RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS OF ANY POTENTIAL RETURN/REFUND FRAUD OR ABUSE OF THE RETAILER'S RETURN POLICY BY CHECKING THE DATABASE FOR CONSUMERS' PRIOR RETURN HISTORY WITH MULTIPLE RETAILERS; ] PROVIDING FRAUD DETECTION SERVICES FOR RETAILERS IN THE FIELD OF MERCHANDISE RETURNS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE WITH CONSUMER INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF RETURN AUTHORIZATION, COUPONS, FRAUD AND ABUSE; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR ALLOWING RETAILERS TO DETECT AND STOP FRAUDULENT AND ABUSIVE RETURN BEHAVIOR AS WELL AS INCREASE SALES AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE TO DELETE CONSUMER FRAUD; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE CONTAINING CUSTOMERS' RETURN INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE THAT COLLECTS AND ANALYZES RETURN INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE WHICH STORES INFORMATION ABOUT CUSTOMERS' HISTORY OF RETURNS TO DETERMINE WHETHER RETURNS SHOULD BE ALLOWED; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR RETAILERS TO PROCESS RETURNS EASILY AND ACCURATELY ACROSS ALL STORES AND CHANNELS THROUGH REAL-TIME RETURN AUTHORIZATIONS THAT SCREEN FOR RETURNS FRAUD BY ANALYZING RETURN BEHAVIOR AND IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC RETURN PATTERNS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE SYSTEM TO ENCOURAGE CUSTOMERS TO MAKE ADDITIONAL PURCHASES AT THE POINT OF TRANSACTION RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR TRACKING OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND DETECTING FRAUDULENT OR ABUSIVE RETURNS OR EXCHANGES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPONS AND INCENTIVES BASED ON CONSUMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOR; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMERS AND RECIPIENTS PRODUCT RETURNS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR ENCOURAGING CUSTOMERS TO MAKE ADDITIONAL PURCHASES AT THE POINT OF TRANSACTION; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RETURN AUTHORIZATION SERVICES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RETURN MANAGEMENT SERVICES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH RECEIPT RECONCILIATION SERVICES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE WITH CONSUMER INFORMATION; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING RETURN INFORMATION; PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR DETECTING AND TRACKING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND IMPROPER RETURNS USED BY RETAILERS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR STORING INFORMATION ABOUT CUSTOMERS' HISTORY OF RETURNS TO DETERMINE WHETHER RETURNS SHOULD BE ALLOWED RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROCESSING RETURNS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATABASE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMERS' AND RECIPIENTS' PRODUCT RETURNS DATA RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR RETAILERS TO PROCESS RETURNS EASILY AND ACCURATELY ACROSS ALL STORES AND CHANNELS THROUGH REAL-TIME RETURN AUTHORIZATIONS THAT SCREEN FOR RETURNS FRAUD BY ANALYZING RETURN BEHAVIOR AND IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC RETURN PATTERNS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FOR USE BY RETAIL STORE OPERATORS OR AT THE POINT OF TRANSACTION TO ENABLE THE RETAILER TO DETERMINE BASED UPON THE CUSTOMER'S RETURN HISTORY, PURCHASE HISTORY AND RETURNED ITEMS, WHETHER THE CUSTOMER SHOULD RECEIVE A SPECIAL OFFER THAT ENCOURAGES THE CUSTOMER TO CONTINUE SHOPPING AT THE RETAIL STORE OR RETURN TO THE STORE AT A LATER TIME; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE DATABASE FOR USE BY RETAIL STORE OPERATORS, TO EVALUATE AND TRACK FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, CUSTOMER SERVICES PERFORMANCE, CUSTOMER AND CONSUMER INFORMATION, COUPON ACTIVITY, INVENTORY, PURCHASE HISTORY, RETURN HISTORY, AND AVAILABLE REWARDS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE WHICH ALLOWS RETAILERS TO SELECT, CONFIGURE AND DELIVER REDEMPTION OFFERS TO CONSUMERS AND POTENTIAL CONSUMERS; NON-DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC DATABASE FOR PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPONS AND INCENTIVES BASED ON CONSUMER PURCHASE BEHAVIOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by The Return Exchange, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE RETAIL EQUATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 14, 2020 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |