Drawing for SCOTIABANK BE

USPTO serial 77320322

SCOTIABANK BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOTIABANK BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie Bertagnolli

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE LLPONE PRUDENTIAL PLAZA130 E. RANDOLPH DRIVE, SUITE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036banking services, financial services, namely, mortgage lending, agencies in the field of bonds and other securities, financial investment in the field of securities, currency exchange and advice, financial information in the nature of rates of exchange, monetary exchange, bilateral or syndicated loans, standby letters of credit, administration of checking account services, corporate loans, commercial loans, retail loans, trade finance facilities, namely, letters of credit, checking account services, term deposits, financial investment in the field of real estate, leasing of real estate, real estate syndication, leasing of office space, leasing of real property, leasing of shopping mall space, electronic funds transfer, financial information provided by electronic means, commodity exchange, commodity quotations, financial investment in the field of precious metals, trust services, namely, investment and trust company services, and credit card servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance