Drawing for THE FINEST ARCHITECTURAL WOODCARVINGS IN THE WORLD

USPTO serial 77320532

THE FINEST ARCHITECTURAL WOODCARVINGS IN THE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FINEST ARCHITECTURAL WOODCARVINGS IN THE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina

KIT M. STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and promotional services pertaining to architectural woodcarving productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 10, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Apr 19, 2008NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance