USPTO serial 77320767
PARATEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARATEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arturo Perez-Guerrero
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical-laboratorial diagnostic instrument, namely, a special and technologically unique vial for use in the collection, storage, concentration, transportation and filtering of feces for parasitological examination | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |