USPTO serial 77321429
DRI-RELEASE E.C.O. ENVIRONMENTALLY CORRECT ORIGINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRI-RELEASE E.C.O. ENVIRONMENTALLY CORRECT ORIGINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
DENISE I. MROZ WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLP2929 ARCH STREETCIRA CENTRE 12TH FLOORPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | boxer shorts, bras, underwear briefs, clothing caps, golf shirts, gym shorts, gym suits, jeans, clothing jerseys, jogging suits, warm-up suits, sweat shorts, sweatpants, sweat shirts, sweat suits, thermal underwear, tennis wear, track suits, underclothes, undergarments, uniforms, fleece tops, polo shirts, golf pants, men's and women's dress shirts, and sports bras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimer Performance Fibers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimer Performance Fibers, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DRI-RELEASE E.C.O. ENVIRONMENTALLY CORRECT ORIGINS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |