USPTO serial 77321457
POM HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POM HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle M. Criona, Esq.
DANIELLE CRIONA ROLL LAW GROUP PC11444 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pomegranate extracts for use as an ingredient in food products; processed nuts; snack mix containing processed nuts; ready to eat food and snack bars, namely, fruit based food bars and fruit based snack bars; energy bars, namely, fruit based snack bars and fruit based food bars; sport bars, namely, fruit based food bars and fruit based snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; tea bags; tea for infusions; tea substitutes; teas-based beverages with fruit flavoring; iced teas and tea-based beverages with pomegranate flavoring; beverages made of tea; fruit teas; green tea; herb tea for food purposes; herbal tea for food purposes; coffee; instant coffee; coffee-based beverage containing milk; prepared ready-to-drink coffee; coffee-based preparations for making beverages; iced coffee; espresso; coffee-based beverages with fruit flavoring and beverages made of coffee; caffeine-free coffee; flavored ices; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; flavoring for beverages; ice cream drinks; fruit ice; fruit ice bar; fruit ices; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; grain-based beverages; grain-based food beverages; milk shakes; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; pomegranate based sugar substitutes; food products, snack products, and snack bars, namely, granola based snack bars and health bars containing, in whole or in part, pomegranates, pomegranates byproducts, and/or pomegranate flavoring; trail mixes consisting primarily of crackers and pretzels; food products, namely, candies, candy, candy bars, candy chews, mints, cereal based energy bars, cereal based snack food, cereal-based snack foods; chewing gum, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, granola-based snack bars, ice cream, ice cream sandwiches; ice cream mixes; ice milk bars, lollipop, muffins, muffin mixes, milk chocolate, pancake mixes, pancake syrup, pastries, processed cereals, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack for or ingredient for making other foods, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars, salad dressings, salad sauces, snack foods chews made primarily from brown rice syrup, snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn, sugar free chewing gum, sugar free sweets, sugarless candies, sugarless chewing gum, sugarless sweets, topping syrup, toffee, and toffees | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits; fresh and unprocessed pomegranates | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in preparation of beverages; preparations for making fruit drinks, and fruit flavored beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; smoothies; bottled drinking water; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; low calorie fruit flavored beverages; low calorie fruit juice drinks; low calorie tea flavored beverages; sports drinks; energy drinks; fruit juices; fruit drinks; fruit juice concentrates; fruit smoothies; fruit flavored drinking water; non-carbonated soft drinks; soda, namely, soda pop; soft drinks, namely, low calorie soft drink and concentrates for making soft drinks; fruit-flavored soft drinks; carbonated beverages; fruit-flavored beverages; coffee-flavored soft drinks; low calorie non-alcoholic beverages with coffee flavor; non-alcoholic beverages containing coffee; and smoothies containing coffee | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PomWonderful LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PomWonderful LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named POM HEALTH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 12, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ISTB | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE-TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |