USPTO serial 77321625
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Borchard
William M. Borchard Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, FRAGRANCES, TOILETRIES, PERSONAL SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE, BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, NON-MEDICATED BATH PREPARATIONS, BATH BALMS, BATH BEADS AND BATH SALTS, AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY, HAND CREAMS, HAND LOTIONS, BODY LOTIONS, FACE AND BODY EXFOLIATORS, BODY BUTTERS AND BODY OIL SPRAY | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, FRAMES FOR SUNGLASSES AND SUNGLASS CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, POCKETBOOKS, SHOULDER BAGS, ROLL BAGS, EVENING HANDBAGS, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, WALLETS, KEY CASES, CLUTCH PURSES, CLUTCH PURSES, CLUTCH BAGS, GENERAL PURPOSE PURSES, DRAWSTRING POUCHES, TOTE BAGS, SLING BAGS, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS, SATCHELS, UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | JEWELRY CASES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, PICTURE FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | HOME FURNISHINGS, NAMELY, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, PILLOWS, DUST RUFFLES, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, COMFORTERS, BLANKET COVERS, DUVET COVERS, COMFORTER COVERS, BED BLANKETS, BEDSPREADS, QUILTS, THROWS, TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, SHOWER CURTAINS, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, TEXTILE TABLE CLOTHS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE LINENS, WINDOW CURTAINS, AND DRAPERIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |