USPTO serial 77321717
WELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3956375Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2011
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
P.C. 1076, Nicosia, CY
P.C. 1076, Nicosia, CY
P.C. 1076, Nicosia, CY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lora A. Moffatt
LORA A. MOFFATT SALANS620 FIFTH AVEROCKEFELLER CENTERNEW YORK, NY 10020Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Videotaping, dubbing, gaming, namely, providing video and on-line computer game and gambling, publication of books, provision of entertainment information, movie studios, game services provided on-line from a computer network, providing non-downloadable on-line electronic publications, namely, magazines in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, arranging and conducting of conferences in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, arranging and conducting of workshops in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, arranging and conducting of seminars in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, arranging and conducting of symposiums in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, organization of competitions in the field of multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, television entertainment, namely, related to multimedia entertainment, video and computer games, videotape film production, film production, rental of video cameras, publication of electronic books and journals on-line, amusements, namely, multimedia entertainment, video and computer games amusement, news reporters services, music composition services for others, scriptwriting services, recording studio services, digital imaging services, production of amusement shows, namely, fashion shows; laser shows; light shows; a series of short musical, variety, news and comedy shows distributed to mobile handsets, which may include video, test, photos, illustrations or hypertext; visual and audio performances and musical variety news and comedy shows; on-going variety, news, music or comedy show broadcast over television, satellite, audio and video media; game shows; comedy shows; television news shows; live show performances; television shows and movies, all the above mentioned services not intended to be used in medical, fitness and elementary school education fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |