Drawing for NETRONOME SSL INSPECTOR

USPTO serial 77321749

NETRONOME SSL INSPECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3768013Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2010
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETRONOME SSL INSPECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. Watt-Morse

Peter M. Watt-Morse MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE OXFORD CENTRE - SUITE 3200301 GRANT STREETPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-6401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated computer hardware and software, namely, a computer network appliance with software for analyzing and processing computer network trafficSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 30, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 14, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 17, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 25, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance