USPTO serial 77322372
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Troy Leonard
TROY N LEONARD WOODS FULLER SHULTZ & SMITH PC300 SOUTH PHILLIPS AVENUESUITE 300SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117-5027| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, golf shirts and track suits, footwear, headgear, namely, hats and caps; kitchen aprons for wear while cooking and baking; bandannas and headbands; bathrobes; bath sandals; bath slippers; bathing caps; beach clothes, namely, swimming costumes, robes, wraps and short pants; beach shoes; clothing belts made of cloth or fabric; lingerie bodices; clothing for gymnastics, namely, leotards, leggings and gymnastic shoes; dressing gowns; jackets; jerseys, sweaters; knitwear, namely, sweaters, and shirts; pajamas; shirts; sports shoes, namely, running shoes, cycling shoes, shoes for aerobics and aerobic exercise, and tennis shoes; sunvisors for headgear; tee-shirts | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |