USPTO serial 77322459
YELLOW POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YELLOW POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yellow Power International SARL
Collonge-Bellerive, CH
Yellow Power International SARL
Collonge-Bellerive, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T. JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN, PLLCVOLUNTEER BUILDING SUITE 1000832 GEORGIA AVENUECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | generators of electricity; ac generators; electric power generators for ships; current generators; emergency electric power generators; electric generators; internal combustion engines for power generation; internal combustion engines for boats; internal combustion engines for machine operation; diesel engines not for land vehicles; diesel engines for machines; gas turbine engines not for land vehicles; current generators; gas generators for powering jet engines being a component part of jet engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |