USPTO serial 77323522
GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3748107Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 2010
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
CLEVELAND, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN E. TURUNG
BRIAN E. TURUNG FAY SHARPE LLP1228 EUCLID AVETHE HALLE BLDG 5TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1834Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic polymer coatings for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic solvent-based or water-based sealer coatings used for waterproofing side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, coatings in the nature of non-metallic masonry sealers for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic concrete paints for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 017 | Waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranes for foundations of buildings; insulating waterproofing non-metallic polymer membranes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
| 019 | Non-metallic polymer roofing membranes; non-metal construction materials, namely, foundation drain and pipe systems consisting of sheet drains, strip drains, strip drain outlets, corner fittings, corner guards, tee connectors, drain splices and drain pipes; construction materials, namely, nonmetal foundation drainage boards and nonmetal foundation protection boards, non-woven fiberglass board or polyester reinforcement fabric for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic rubberized-base or asphalt-based cement for side walls, flooring, foundations, and/or roofing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GMX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GMX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GMX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named GMX HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |