USPTO serial 77327232
ZIPPY THE KWIRK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZIPPY THE KWIRK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Rodner
Stephen B. Rodner Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Aerodynamic flying discs for playing toss-type game; arcade games; audio/visual toy projectors and accessories; board games made of paper; board games made of cardboard; board games made of metal and/or plastic; board games adaptable to mechanical apparatus and applications; card games; cases for toy vehicles; children's play cosmetics; coin-operated video games; construction toys; dart games; dice; disc toss toys; electronic action skill games; electronic dart games; electronic pinball games; equipment sold as a unit for playing a board game and puzzles; equipment sold as a unit for playing a video game; games which can be played by one person and fit into that persons hand while being played; gum figure makers; gum machines; hand held games; hand held units for playing action skill games; hand held non electronic games; hand held units for playing electronic games; in-line skates; jigsaw puzzles; kites, kite strings, kite tails, kite reels, kite lines, kite parts, and kite handles; manipulative and cube puzzles; milk cap games; music box toys; non electronic pinball games; non electronic arcade games; packaged amusement and educational toys in the nature of board games; play sets for toy vehicles; plush toys; printing toys; protective pads and padding for skateboarding in-line skating, and roller skating; pinball machines; puzzles; role playing games; roller skates; scooters; skateboards; spinning tops game; stand alone video game machines; surfboards; table top action skill games related to wrestling; three wheel cycle for use by children; toy belts; toy candy dispensers and holders; toy championship belts; toy film cartridges and viewers therefor; toy foam weapons; toy model vehicles and related accessories therefor sold as units; toy modeling compound and accessories; toy musical instruments; toy paint sets; toy pedal cars; toy snow globes; toy vehicles; toy vehicles made of non-precious metals; toy watches; toy weapons; but excluding any good shaped like, or containing the likeness of, a dolphin or other fish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |