Drawing for VIPS

USPTO serial 77327375

VIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joi A. White

Joi A. White CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 Geng RoadPalo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software in the area of computer security for assuring the integrity of computer hardware, computer servers, computer applications, computer data, and databasesACTIVE—
016Printed matters, namely, brochures and manuals in the area of computer securityACTIVE—
041Training services in the field of computer securityACTIVE—
042Computer consultation services in the area of computer securityACTIVE—
045Computer services, namely, monitoring of computer systems for providing computer security and protecting the computer systems, and maintaining the integrity of the computer systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 12, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 12, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 27, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 23, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance