USPTO serial 77330550
CANDY & CANDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3805217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CANDY & CANDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Esher, Surrey, GB
Esher, Surrey, GB
Esher, Surrey, GB
ST. PETER PORT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward E. Vassallo and Jessica Hiney
EDWARD E. VASSALLO AND JESSICA HINEY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | [Design and development of computer hardware and software;] advisory services relating to interior design; architectural design for interior decoration; architectural services relating to land development, namely, architectural consultation; [architectural services relating to the development of land, namely, architectural consultation;] commercial interior design; consultancy services relating to interior design; consultation services relating to interior design; design of interior decor; design of building interiors; design of interior décor; design of interior decoration; design services for building interiors; design services for the interior of buildings; design services relating to interior decorating for homes; [design services relating to interior decorating for offices;] design services relating to interior decoration; [design services relating to shop interiors;] furnishing design services for the interiors of buildings; information services relating to the combination of colours, paints and furnishings for interior design; information services relating to the harmonisation of colours, paints and furnishings for interior design; interior decor design; interior decorating design; interior design services; [interior design services for boutiques; interior design services for shops; interior design services for the retail industry;] design of and space planning of interiors; professional consultancy relating to the design of interior accommodation, and design of and space planning of interiors; architectural services, namely, architectural design; architectural consultation services; [architectural services relating to the development of land, namely, architectural design;] and interior decoration services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Candy & Candy Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Candy & Candy Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Candy & Candy Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CPC GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CANDY & CANDY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |