Drawing for PIPERS

USPTO serial 77331590

PIPERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Felicia J. Boyd

FELICIA J. BOYD FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 S 7TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, structuring and issuance of convertible securities; brokerage and issuance of preferred stock securities and other debt or equity instrumentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 3, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 29, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 29, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 29, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 29, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 3, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 3, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 11, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 11, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Mar 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 3, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance