USPTO serial 77331906
1ST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4250312Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2012
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 1ST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Canton, MA
WILMINGTON, DE
Foxboro, MA
Foxboro, MA
FOXBORO, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
Julia Spoor Gard BARNES & THORNBURG LLPP.O. BOX 2786Chicago, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | emery boards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 006 | cabinet stops and metal door stops; metal latches and locks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 008 | Scissors and nail clippers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 009 | safety covers and plugs for electrical outlets, bath thermometers; fever thermometers; digital video monitors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 010 | teething rings; medical ice packs, spoons for administering medicine; droppers for administering medication sold empty; nasal aspirators for infants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 011 | electric night lights; child safe protective covers for bathtub spouts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 012 | children's car seats, car booster seats; strollers, automotive accessories for child safety, namely, automobile clip-on rear view mirrors and vinyl sunscreens for automobiles; tricycles; wheelchairs; electric adult motorized scooters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2011 |
| 017 | door stops of rubber | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 018 | diaper bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 019 | non-luminous, non-mechanical safety signs not of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 020 | high chairs, folding play yards for children, bassinets, booster seats, bed rails, portable baby bath seats for use in bath tubs; door stops of plastic and wood; non-metal latches and locks; non-metal toilet seat locks; portable cribs; step stools, folding furniture; non-metal safety gates for temporary mounting on door frames to prevent access; bumper guards for furniture | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2011 |
| 021 | hairbrushes, toothbrushes, toothbrush holders, diaper pails, infant bath tubs, potties for children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 022 | webbed bags for use as laundry bags or toy bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 026 | child restraining devices in the nature of webbing harness straps for toddlers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
| 028 | children's ride-on toys; bath toys, infant toys; play and exercise equipment for children, namely, floor bouncers, floor exercisers, and swings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COSCO MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named 1ST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |