Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77332676?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77332676. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77332676, the listed owner(s) include: Paul D. Miller.

What is USPTO serial number 77332676?

Serial number 77332676 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?

COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF (77332676) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?

The public record lists International Classes: 028. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77332676

COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Nov 19, 2007
Status date: Apr 28, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Paul D. Miller
Gotha, FL
Other trademarks owned by Paul D. Miller

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew G. McKinney

MATTHEW G. MCKINNEY MCKINNEY LAW, LLC390 N ORANGE AVE STE 2300ORLANDO, FL 32801-1684UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
028	Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 28, 2010	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 28, 2010	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 28, 2010	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 12, 2010	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jan 27, 2010	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Jul 28, 2009	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 28, 2009	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Jul 28, 2009	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jun 5, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 28, 2009	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Mar 28, 2009	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Mar 28, 2009	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Mar 6, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Feb 25, 2009	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Feb 25, 2009	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Feb 25, 2009	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jan 21, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 24, 2008	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Nov 24, 2008	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 10, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 1, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 1, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 2, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 2, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 23, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—