Drawing for BRILLIANT POWER

USPTO serial 77332790

BRILLIANT POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRILLIANT POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonard T. Nuara

Leonard T. Nuara Greenberg Traurig, LLP200 Park AvenuePO Box 677Florham Park, NJ 07932

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric or electronic sensors for sensing temperature, humidity and other environmental information, and for voltage, current, and other electrical characteristics when sensors are integrated in power outlets and other power transmitting structures; data transmission products, namely, wired and wireless networked routers, switches, servers and other specialized electronics, namely, metered power electrical outlets and sensors, for providing temperature, humidity and environmental information and control; rack management systems for providing temperature, humidity and environmental information and control, comprising data import, characterization, correlation, analysis, modeling, decision and environment altering command electronic hardware; environmental control systems for computer, electronic equipment and machinery, comprising data import, characterization, correlation, analysis, modeling, decision and environment altering command electronic hardware, and manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—
011Environmental control systems comprised of heating, ventilation, air conditioning and water delivery apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 6, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance