Drawing for PARIVAR

USPTO serial 77333747

PARIVAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARIVAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Cafe servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 23, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 21, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 13, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 22, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 22, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 27, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance