USPTO serial 77333861
GREEN BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Kuborn
JOSEPH D. KUBORN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESUITE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Corrugated cardboard, paperboard and laminated paperboard packaging, laminated paperboard edge protectors for use in shipping and packaging, protective packaging made from molded fiber made from recycled paper and cardboard for packaging rolls of film, namely, roll supports made from molded fiber made from recycled paper and cardboard | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Point of purchase displays | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |