USPTO serial 77334635
THE DELINQUENT THE HIPSTER AND THE SQUARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE DELINQUENT THE HIPSTER AND THE SQUARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Garments, namely, shirts, t-shirts, knitted shirts, pants, shorts, skirts, jackets, blazers, coats and underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |