USPTO serial 77335023
PREBIOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PREBIOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Granby, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Weber
JOHN WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |