USPTO serial 77335590
ZARICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZARICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St-Hubert, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Hyman
JONATHAN HYMAN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Intent to Use) Cheese(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |