CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EARTHWISE

USPTO serial 77336023

EARTHWISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHWISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Serritella

JOSEPH J. SERRITELLA PEPPER HAMILTON LLPEIGHTEENTH AND ARCH STREETS3000 TWO LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yogurt; drinkable yogurtACTIVE—
030Non-juice drinks, namely, teaACTIVE—
032Refrigerated and shelf-stable, non-carbonated juice-based drinks with five percent or more juice content; bottled waters; bottled drinking water with vitamins; energy drinks fortified with caffeine, vitamins, minerals, and herbs or combinations thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 15, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 10, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 8, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 17, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 17, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2009OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 30, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 30, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 30, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 4, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance