CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AMIR

USPTO serial 77336416

AMIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

Sherry H. Flax Saul Ewing LLP500 E. Pratt St.Suite 900Baltimore, MD 21202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039food delivery servicesACTIVE—
040providing food manufacturing services for othersACTIVE—
043food preparation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 27, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 27, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 1, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance