CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STUDIO & PARTNERS

USPTO serial 77338040

STUDIO & PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUDIO & PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Consulting services in the field of furniture evaluation for insurance purposesACTIVE—
037Consulting services in the field of furniture restorationACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the fields of architecture and design; consulting services in the field of furniture design; interior design and exterior design services; furniture and furniture parts design services; graphic art design services; industrial design servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 27, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance